Talk:Performances

Items links

I'm wondering whether the "[… items]" links shouldn't say "[view … items]" instead, to make it more clear at-a-glance that you need to click on them to see more information. - dcljr (talk) 17:02, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

I don't know: That would add a lot of dead text, but is a hint any user only needs to see once. It would cause more clutter, and on mobiles more lines to break. The blue color was chosen to represent a link, so I'd expect that most users would get that without further help. I did try different versions back then, also with added +/- signs in closed/open status, but in my mind that all made it look worse. How about adding a sentence of explanation in the introduction section instead? Like "The data rows are shown after clicking/touching the number of items indications."? Also, I consider to add an option that small tables, like the setlist in the [Christmas tour 2017] article, could by default be expanded. Observing those open tables could act as a further hint that these header lines top collapsed sections. -Most2dot0 (talk) 19:35, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

OK re the "[… items]" links. The intro already had an explanation, and now it has an even more detailed one (because I wasn't sure the point was getting across). - dcljr (talk) 00:03, 15 August 2025 (UTC)